Seth Klarman on Compounding

It was always heartening to know that somebody like Buffett, who seemed to think similarly to how I thought — thought about downside risk, thought about the need to stay focused on individual companies and not worry so much about the overall market, the willingness to hold cash, and concurrently the willingness to not have an opinion on everything. I have a lot of ideas and I end up with no opinion, no position. But once in a while we find something that seems way off the beaten path that’s really interesting. To watch Warren Buffett do that — I’ve realized now that Warren probably had a certainty of the idea that he would compound capital over a long period of time. And I think that is something that Graham gave Warren, and Warren gave me as well: the idea that if you protect on the downside, if you don’t find yourself getting margin calls, frozen in place because you’re too exposed, or getting massive redemptions because you’re down so much — if you can position yourself that way, it can leave you in a position to play offense when even your best competitors might not be on the playing field. And that’s a huge advantage. So Graham and Dodd is kind of a North Star, a place where you can stay focused on what something’s worth. You can ignore the herd. You can ignore the siren song of growth at any price, of exciting new technologies and exciting IPOs.

Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others. The Compound Media, Inc., an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers Please see disclosures here: https://ritholtzwealth.com/blog-disclosures/

Asked about the firm's holding periods, Klarman noted that Baupost's average position lasts several years, with some held for a decade or more. He framed this not as a stylistic preference but as the natural consequence of buying assets that are cheap relative to conservative value and waiting for the gap to close. He observed that the closing of the price-to-value gap is rarely a smooth process. Sometimes a catalyst appears - a takeover, a recapitalization, a reorganization. Often the catalyst is simply time, as the business generates cash that ultimately forces the market to re-rate it. The investor who demands a near-term catalyst before acting tends to miss the situations where the catalyst is simply patient compounding. The compounding implication is that the firm's returns are largely earned in the gaps between transactions. Baupost is not, by design, a high-turnover firm. Its edge is in identifying the gap, sizing into it, and waiting. The cost of this style is the years of relative underperformance during bull markets; the benefit is the avoidance of permanent loss during bear markets. Over a multi-decade horizon the compounding math has favored the style, but Klarman has been explicit that the style requires clients willing to accept multi-year stretches of looking wrong.

Klarman frames Baupost's permanent-capital structure as a strategic advantage rather than a financial arrangement. Because the firm's capital is locked up for multi-year horizons, the portfolio can hold illiquid assets, ride out periods of marked-to-market pain, and wait years for a thesis to mature. The same edge is unavailable to funds whose investors can redeem quarterly. He emphasizes that the absence of redemption pressure changes not just the trade list but the kinds of opportunities that become investible. Real estate workouts, bankruptcy claims, private distressed debt, and certain international situations all require the willingness to commit capital for several years without interim liquidity. A fund whose investors require monthly liquidity cannot underwrite these even if its analysts are capable. The compounding implication is significant. In asset classes where returns accrue to whoever can wait, structural patience becomes a moat that scales. Klarman argues this is one of the few edges in investing that does not get competed away by information: knowing that a security will eventually be worth more is rarely enough; the firm that can sit through the noise until that resolution arrives is the one that captures the premium. Permanent capital, in his view, is the institutional expression of patience.